Brett Hlavinka
Chris Aikens

I enjoyed this paper more than I thought I would at first glance. I originally thought that there was no need for mice and keyboards with multi-touch systems because the ability to provide multiple inputs should take care of the need for this norm. When I thought of this, I neglected to realize the fact that current multi-touch technology has a "lag" when things are inputted. This immediately corrected my thinking about having keyboards as a needed peripheral but I will still wary of the mouse. Currently, most multi-touch devices are fairly small so the thought of a mouse as a natural "arm extension" seems plausible. Also after looking at FTIR readings from hand input, I realize that the input is actually a "blob" not the "perfect point" that a mouse delivers. This definitely raises some support from me for the mouse. While I am altogether not sold on the mouse being absolutely necessary (a stylus is a much more natural method of precision and could replace the mouse easily), I find that the keyboard being a temporarily necessary device intriguing. Once technology advances to where multi-touch keyboards are just as fast as the peripheral, I think it will begin to fade out of our daily lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment